163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12005146)
1. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible.
Wanschitz F; Birkfellner W; Watzinger F; Schopper C; Patruta S; Kainberger F; Figl M; Kettenbach J; Bergmann H; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 12005146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems.
Ruppin J; Popovic A; Strauss M; Spüntrup E; Steiner A; Stoll C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 18492085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of virtually planned and conventionally placed implants in edentulous cadaver maxillae and mandibles: a preliminary report.
Gillot L; Cannas B; Friberg B; Vrielinck L; Rohner D; Pettersson A
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 24993376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in patients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy.
Wagner A; Wanschitz F; Birkfellner W; Zauza K; Klug C; Schicho K; Kainberger F; Czerny C; Bergmann H; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Jun; 14(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 12755784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Özen T
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 21767205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-guided flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a new combination of two innovative techniques.
Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Gigovic N; Turhani D; Enislidis G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 16731389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible.
Casap N; Tarazi E; Wexler A; Sonnenfeld U; Lustmann J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 15747679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing the edentulous mandible using recent technological developments: a case study.
Sethi A; Kaus T; Sharma N; Sochor P
Prim Dent J; 2013 Apr; 2(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 23726493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a pilot study in 20 patients.
Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Figl M; Enislidis G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 17974116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles.
Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
