These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12005441)

  • 1. Reliability of assessment of protein structure prediction methods.
    Marti-Renom MA; Madhusudhan MS; Fiser A; Rost B; Sali A
    Structure; 2002 Mar; 10(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 12005441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
    Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11.
    Cao R; Bhattacharya D; Adhikari B; Li J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-59. PubMed ID: 26369671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meeting review: the Second meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2), Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996.
    Dunbrack RL; Gerloff DL; Bower M; Chen X; Lichtarge O; Cohen FE
    Fold Des; 1997; 2(2):R27-42. PubMed ID: 9135979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of refinement of template-based models in CASP11.
    Modi V; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):260-81. PubMed ID: 27081793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.
    Bonneau R; Strauss CE; Rohl CA; Chivian D; Bradley P; Malmström L; Robertson T; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Sep; 322(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 12215415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards the high-resolution protein structure prediction. Fast refinement of reduced models with all-atom force field.
    Kmiecik S; Gront D; Kolinski A
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Jun; 7():43. PubMed ID: 17603876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4.
    Zemla A; Venclovas ; Moult J; Fidelis K
    Proteins; 2001; Suppl 5():13-21. PubMed ID: 11835478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution.
    Sun HP; Huang Y; Wang XF; Zhang Y; Shen HB
    Proteins; 2015 Mar; 83(3):485-96. PubMed ID: 25524593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative modeling in CASP5: progress is evident, but alignment errors remain a significant hindrance.
    Venclovas C
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():380-8. PubMed ID: 14579326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid knot detection and application to protein structure prediction.
    Khatib F; Weirauch MT; Rohl CA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e252-9. PubMed ID: 16873480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toolbox for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1369():363-77. PubMed ID: 26519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.
    Moult J; Fidelis K; Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29082672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models.
    Cozzetto D; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2005 Jan; 58(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 15495137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of performance ranking in CASP--response to Marti-Renom et al.
    Moult J; Fidelis K; Zemla A; Hubbard T; Tramontano A
    Structure; 2002 Mar; 10(3):291-2; discussion 292-3. PubMed ID: 12005428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated server predictions in CASP7.
    Battey JN; Kopp J; Bordoli L; Read RJ; Clarke ND; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():68-82. PubMed ID: 17894354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11.
    Modi V; Xu Q; Adhikari S; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):200-20. PubMed ID: 27081927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A large-scale conformation sampling and evaluation server for protein tertiary structure prediction and its assessment in CASP11.
    Li J; Cao R; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():337. PubMed ID: 26493701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In silico Identification and Characterization of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1414():1-21. PubMed ID: 27094282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.