These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12006140)

  • 21. Output characteristics of DeVilbiss No. 40 hand-held jet nebulizers.
    Chan KN; Clay MM; Silverman M
    Eur Respir J; 1990 Nov; 3(10):1197-201. PubMed ID: 2090484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The physical properties of a jet-nebulizer and their relevance for the histamine provocation test.
    Sterk PJ; Plomp A; Crobach MJ; van de Vate JF; Quanjer PH
    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1983; 19(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 6850144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests.
    Coates AL; Leung K; Dell SD
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2014 Feb; 27(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23586502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Challenging the two-minute tidal breathing challenge test.
    Lexmond AJ; Hagedoorn P; Frijlink HW; de Boer AH
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2013 Dec; 26(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 23509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nebulizer output for methacholine challenges with the KoKo Digidoser.
    Khan YR; McDonough P; Cockcroft DW; David BE; Hendeles L
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Oct; 116(4):924-6. PubMed ID: 16210072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Output of histamine chloride from 7 nebulizers.
    Nortoft E; Bundgaard A
    Eur J Respir Dis Suppl; 1986; 143():8-10. PubMed ID: 3462021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Different performance of two commercial nebulizers.
    Arossa W; Quagliotti F; Sala M; Spinaci S; De Candussio G
    Respiration; 1984; 46(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 6494601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A set-up for bronchial provocation by continuously generated aerosols.
    Moldovan D; Gliga M; Simon L; Boga F; Jazigian A
    Rom J Intern Med; 1994; 32(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 7613504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simple in vitro method for the evaluation of an ultrasonic nebulizer for drug delivery to intubated, ventilated patients and the effect of nebulizer and ventilator settings on the uptake of fluid from the nebulizer chamber.
    Williams L; Fletcher GC; Daniel M; Kinsella J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1999 Jul; 16(7):479-84. PubMed ID: 10457881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of nebulizer type with different pediatric aerosol masks on drug deposition in a model of a spontaneously breathing small child.
    Lin HL; Wan GH; Chen YH; Fink JB; Liu WQ; Liu KY
    Respir Care; 2012 Nov; 57(11):1894-900. PubMed ID: 22418694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The salt output of a nebulizer--a comparison between two nebulizer types.
    Eklund L; Sundblad BM; Malmberg P; Larsson K
    Respir Med; 2000 Feb; 94(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vitro method for determining regional dosages delivered by jet nebulizers.
    Stapleton KW; Finlay WH; Zuberbuhler P
    J Aerosol Med; 1994; 7(4):325-44. PubMed ID: 10150486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.
    Hartley-Sharpe CJ; Booth H; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Thorax; 1995 Jun; 50(6):635-8. PubMed ID: 7638805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro comparison of DeVilbiss jet and ultrasonic nebulizers.
    Newman SP; Pellow PG; Clarke SW
    Chest; 1987 Dec; 92(6):991-4. PubMed ID: 3677844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The equivalence of compressor pressure-flow relationships with respect to jet nebulizer aerosolization characteristics.
    Standaert TA; Bohn SE; Aitken ML; Ramsey B
    J Aerosol Med; 2001; 14(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11495483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective evaluation of aerosol delivery by a powered nasal nebulizer in the cadaver model.
    Manes RP; Tong L; Batra PS
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2011; 1(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 22287468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Formulations generated from ethanol-based proliposomes for delivery via medical nebulizers.
    Elhissi AM; Karnam KK; Danesh-Azari MR; Gill HS; Taylor KM
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2006 Jul; 58(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 16805947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of dead volume on the efficiency and the cost to deliver medications in cystic fibrosis with four disposable nebulizers.
    Ho SL; Coates AL
    Can Respir J; 1999; 6(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10393287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Aerosol production and aerosol droplet size distribution during mechanical ventilation (IPPV) with a new ultrasonic nebulizer.
    Kemming GI; Kreyling W; Habler O; Merkel M; Kleen M; Welte M; Messmer K; Zwissler B
    Eur J Med Res; 1996 Apr; 1(7):321-7. PubMed ID: 9364032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new aerosol device for bronchial provocation tests.
    Matthys H; Knoch M; Eltschka R
    Respiration; 1993; 60(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 8290799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.