BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12006436)

  • 1. Screening for lung cancer with CT: a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Chirikos TN; Hazelton T; Tockman M; Clark R
    Chest; 2002 May; 121(5):1507-14. PubMed ID: 12006436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Black WC; Gareen IF; Soneji SS; Sicks JD; Keeler EB; Aberle DR; Naeim A; Church TR; Silvestri GA; Gorelick J; Gatsonis C;
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(19):1793-802. PubMed ID: 25372087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Mahadevia PJ; Fleisher LA; Frick KD; Eng J; Goodman SN; Powe NR
    JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 12525232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
    Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
    Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Kumar V; Cohen JT; van Klaveren D; Soeteman DI; Wong JB; Neumann PJ; Kent DM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 168(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 29297005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for lung cancer screening in Italy.
    Veronesi G; Navone N; Novellis P; Dieci E; Toschi L; Velutti L; Solinas M; Vanni E; Alloisio M; Ghislandi S
    Lung Cancer; 2020 May; 143():73-79. PubMed ID: 32234647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Black WC
    J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 25635704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in a European country with high prevalence of smoking-A modelling study.
    Tomonaga Y; Ten Haaf K; Frauenfelder T; Kohler M; Kouyos RD; Shilaih M; Lorez M; de Koning HJ; Schwenkglenks M; Puhan MA
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Jul; 121():61-69. PubMed ID: 29858029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of baseline low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the Israeli experience.
    Shmueli A; Fraifeld S; Peretz T; Gutfeld O; Gips M; Sosna J; Shaham D
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):922-31. PubMed ID: 24041342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in heavy smokers: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Heuvelmans MA; Groen HJM; Vermeulen KM; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():121-129. PubMed ID: 32563896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: preliminary results of baseline screening.
    Wisnivesky JP; Mushlin AI; Sicherman N; Henschke C
    Chest; 2003 Aug; 124(2):614-21. PubMed ID: 12907551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Das P; Ng AK; Earle CC; Mauch PM; Kuntz KM
    Ann Oncol; 2006 May; 17(5):785-93. PubMed ID: 16500905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.
    Raymakers AJN; Mayo J; Lam S; FitzGerald JM; Whitehurst DGT; Lynd LD
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 26873091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of whole-body CT screening.
    Beinfeld MT; Wittenberg E; Gazelle GS
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 15670999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of hybrid PET/CT for staging of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Schreyögg J; Weller J; Stargardt T; Herrmann K; Bluemel C; Dechow T; Glatting G; Krause BJ; Mottaghy F; Reske SN; Buck AK
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Nov; 51(11):1668-75. PubMed ID: 21051648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 18FDG-PET-CT in the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: an economic evaluation.
    van Loon J; Grutters JP; Wanders R; Boersma L; Dingemans AM; Bootsma G; Geraedts W; Pitz C; Simons J; Brans B; Snoep G; Hochstenbag M; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 19944595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.