124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12007964)
1. Advantages of using noncoplanar vs. axial beam arrangements when treating prostate cancer with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and the step-and-shoot delivery method.
Price RA; Hanks GE; McNeeley SW; Horwitz EM; Pinover WH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 May; 53(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 12007964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.
Ghilezan M; Yan D; Liang J; Jaffray D; Wong J; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1602-10. PubMed ID: 15590192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.
De Meerleer GO; Vakaet LA; De Gersem WR; De Wagter C; De Naeyer B; De Neve W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):639-48. PubMed ID: 10837946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of IMRT in reducing penile doses in dose escalation for prostate cancer.
Sethi A; Mohideen N; Leybovich L; Mulhall J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(4):970-8. PubMed ID: 12605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.
Dogan N; King S; Emami B; Mohideen N; Mirkovic N; Leybovich LB; Sethi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1480-91. PubMed ID: 14630288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy.
Pickett B; Vigneault E; Kurhanewicz J; Verhey L; Roach M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(4):921-9. PubMed ID: 10386651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of small and large bowel irradiation using an optimized intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy technique in patients with prostate cancer.
Nutting CM; Convery DJ; Cosgrove VP; Rowbottom C; Padhani AR; Webb S; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Oct; 48(3):649-56. PubMed ID: 11020560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric study of pelvic proton radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Chera BS; Vargas C; Morris CG; Louis D; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Duvvuri S; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):994-1002. PubMed ID: 19619961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose escalation in prostate cancer using intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy.
Snyder M; Joiner MC; Konski A; Bossenberger T; Burmeister J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 May; 99(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21620496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pilot study of conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Aillères N; Azria D; Thézenas S; Barbier N; Fenoglietto P; Delard R; Hay MH; Dubois JB
Cancer Radiother; 2004 Apr; 8(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 15063872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal dose reduction with IMRT for prostate radiotherapy.
Hardcastle N; Davies A; Foo K; Miller A; Metcalfe PE
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Jun; 54(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 20598012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereotactic IMRT for prostate cancer: dosimetric impact of multileaf collimator leaf width in the treatment of prostate cancer with IMRT.
Wang L; Movsas B; Jacob R; Fourkal E; Chen L; Price R; Feigenberg S; Konski A; Pollack A; Ma C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(2):29-41. PubMed ID: 15738911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal tissue dosimetric comparison between HDR prostate implant boost and conformal external beam radiotherapy boost: potential for dose escalation.
Hsu IC; Pickett B; Shinohara K; Krieg R; Roach M; Phillips T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Mar; 46(4):851-8. PubMed ID: 10705005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
