These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1200817)

  • 21. [Use of pneumatic braces in the rehabilitation of motor handicaps].
    Rideau Y; Brault JF; Caillaud J
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1975; 61(7):647-61. PubMed ID: 133424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Longitudinal assessment of oxygen cost and velocity in children with myelomeningocele: comparison of the hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis and the reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Thomas SS; Buckon CE; Melchionni J; Magnusson M; Aiona MD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 11675558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low energy cost reciprocal walking for the adult paraplegic.
    Patrick JH; McClelland MR
    Paraplegia; 1985 Apr; 23(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 4000691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on paraplegic gait performance.
    IJzerman MJ; Baardman G; Hermens HJ; Veltink PH; Boom HB; Zilvold G
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9141126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Functional ambulation in myelodysplasia: the effect of orthotic selection on physical and physiologic performance.
    Flandry F; Burke S; Roberts JM; Hall S; Drouilhet A; Davis G; Cook S
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1986; 6(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 3793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Paraplegic use of the Orlau swivel walker: case report.
    Seymour RJ; Knapp CF; Anderson TR; Kearney JT
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 Oct; 63(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7138261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Energy cost and physiological reactions to effort during activation of paraplegics by functional electrical stimulation.
    Isakov E; Mizrahi J; Graupe D; Becker E; Najenson T
    Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1985; 12():102-7. PubMed ID: 3879380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis.
    Colombo G; Joerg M; Schreier R; Dietz V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 11321005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electromyography of the upper limbs during computer work: a comparison of 2 wrist orthoses in healthy adults.
    Ferrigno IS; Cliquet A; Magna LA; Zoppi Filho A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Jul; 90(7):1152-8. PubMed ID: 19577029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Robotic orthoses in French-speaking Switzerland to rehabilitate paraplegic patients].
    Vonnez JL
    Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Oct; 2(83):2369-70. PubMed ID: 17112089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance.
    Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical performance of artificial pneumatic muscles to power an ankle-foot orthosis.
    Gordon KE; Sawicki GS; Ferris DP
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1832-41. PubMed ID: 16023126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance specification for lower limb orthotic devices.
    Johnson GR; Ferrarin M; Harrington M; Hermens H; Jonkers I; Mak P; Stallard J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Aug; 19(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 15288457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the attitude of paraplegic individuals to the walkabout orthosis and the isocentric reciprocal gait orthosis.
    Harvey LA; Newton-John T; Davis GM; Smith MB; Engel S
    Spinal Cord; 1997 Sep; 35(9):580-4. PubMed ID: 9300962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of dynamic orthoses on gait: a retrospective control study in children with hemiplegia.
    Van Gestel L; Molenaers G; Huenaerts C; Seyler J; Desloovere K
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18173633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lower extremity telescopic orthosis for immediate fitting in paraplegia.
    Limbird TJ; Stills M; Elliott D; Wharton G
    Orthopedics; 1989 Jun; 12(6):851-4. PubMed ID: 2740266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-generated orthoses. A review.
    Grumbine N
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1993 Jul; 10(3):377-91. PubMed ID: 8364842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of orthosis stiffness on paraplegic ambulation and its implications for functional electrical stimulation (FES) walking systems.
    Stallard J; Major RE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1995 Aug; 19(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 8570380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The physiological benefits of paraplegic orthotically aided walking.
    Ogilvie C; Bowker P; Rowley DI
    Paraplegia; 1993 Feb; 31(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8446454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biomechanical and physiological evaluation of FES-activated paraplegic patients.
    Isakov E; Mizrahi J; Najenson T
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jul; 23(3):9-19. PubMed ID: 3490568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.