151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12008191)
1. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review.
Flobbe K; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; van Engelshoven JM
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(8):1044-50. PubMed ID: 12008191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in combination with mammography for breast cancer within 2 cm: a meta-analysis].
Lin H; Lin H; Liang H
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1699-703. PubMed ID: 24273283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of substratified combined imaging assessment with mammography and ultrasonography for Chinese women with palpable breast masses.
Li J; Xing P; Feng L; Dong H; Jin F; Wu Y; Zheng X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Apr; 144(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 24519388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yuan WH; Hsu HC; Chen YY; Wu CH
Br J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 123(4):673-688. PubMed ID: 32528118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.
Redmond CE; Healy GM; Murphy CF; O'Doherty A; Foster A
Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27271165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tadesse GF; Tegaw EM; Abdisa EK
J Ultrasound; 2023 Jun; 26(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36696046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection.
Lalji U; Lobbes M
Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program.
Buchberger W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Knapp R; Gautsch K; Oberaigner W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():24-29. PubMed ID: 29571797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Point/counterpoint. Ultrasonography is soon likely to become a viable alternative to x-ray mammography for breast cancer screening.
Glide-Hurst CK; Maidment AD; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4526-9. PubMed ID: 20964169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan.
Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography.
Häberle L; Fasching PA; Brehm B; Heusinger K; Jud SM; Loehberg CR; Hack CC; Preuss C; Lux MP; Hartmann A; Vachon CM; Meier-Meitinger M; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R
Int J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 139(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 27389655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
