These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12008652)

  • 1. The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Michael DD; Goding GS
    J Voice; 2002 Mar; 16(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 12008652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Heuer RJ; Michael DD; Ostrowski R; Horman M; Baroody MM; Hillenbrand J; Sataloff RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2003 Apr; 112(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 12731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
    Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
    Mizuta M; Abe C; Taguchi E; Takeue T; Tamaki H; Haji T
    J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):770-776. PubMed ID: 32951954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vocal Changes of Men and Women from Different Age Decades: An Analysis from 30 Years of Age.
    Oliveira Santos A; Godoy J; Silverio K; Brasolotto A
    J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):840-850. PubMed ID: 34284927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral and cepstral measurements in women with behavioral dysphonia.
    Paiva GM; Silva POC; Silva LJAD; Nascimento KA; Silva ABDVE; Abreu SR; Almeida AAF; Lopes LW
    Codas; 2023; 36(1):e20220327. PubMed ID: 37970895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cepstral Measures in the Fado Voice: Gender, Age and Phonatory Tasks.
    Mendes AP; Nunes N; Ibrahim S; Coelho AC; Francisco MA
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 33046277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the measures of cepstral peak prominence as a measure of dysphonia severity in Spanish-speaking subjects.
    Núñez-Batalla F; Cartón-Corona N; Vasile G; García-Cabo P; Fernández-Vañes L; Llorente-Pendás JL
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 70(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 30097163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the relationship between spectral and cepstral measures of voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
    Awan SN; Roy N; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 24698884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
    Maryn Y; Weenink D
    J Voice; 2015 Jan; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 25499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
    Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
    Phadke KV; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A; Švec JG
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):485.e33-485.e43. PubMed ID: 30342798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
    Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Pitch Strength With Perceptual and Other Acoustic Metric Outcome Measures Following Medialization Laryngoplasty.
    Rubin AD; Jackson-Menaldi C; Kopf LM; Marks K; Skeffington J; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R; Hunter EJ
    J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 29773324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cepstral measures in the assessment of severity of voice disorders.
    Lopes LW; Sousa ESDS; Silva ACFD; Silva IMD; Paiva MAA; Vieira VJD; Almeida AA
    Codas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):e20180175. PubMed ID: 31433040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
    Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of laryngeal reinnervation by ansa cervicalis transfer.
    Olson DE; Goding GS; Michael DD
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Dec; 108(12):1767-72. PubMed ID: 9851489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.