These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12009039)

  • 1. Speakers' overestimation of their effectiveness.
    Keysar B; Henly AS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 May; 13(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 12009039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices.
    Lockridge CB; Brennan SE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 12412896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation.
    Yoon SO; Koh S; Brown-Schmidt S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):699-707. PubMed ID: 22572985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication.
    Rossnagel CS
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 15267127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers?
    Bašnáková J; van Berkum J; Weber K; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():79-91. PubMed ID: 25858603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speaker overestimation of communication effectiveness and fear of negative evaluation: being realistic is unrealistic.
    Fay N; Page AC; Serfaty C; Tai V; Winkler C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1160-5. PubMed ID: 19001584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overhearers Use Addressee Backchannels in Dialog Comprehension.
    Tolins J; Fox Tree JE
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1412-34. PubMed ID: 26331673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextual Integration in Multiparty Audience Design.
    Yoon SO; Brown-Schmidt S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Dec; 43(12):e12807. PubMed ID: 31858629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1289-311. PubMed ID: 22671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Cognitive Load Influences Speakers' Choice of Referring Expressions.
    Vogels J; Krahmer E; Maes A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1396-418. PubMed ID: 25471259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface of Linguistic and Visual Information During Audience Design.
    Fukumura K
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1419-33. PubMed ID: 25475568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention to Speech-Accompanying Gestures: Eye Movements and Information Uptake.
    Gullberg M; Kita S
    J Nonverbal Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(4):251-277. PubMed ID: 19862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.
    Arnold JE; Kahn JM; Pancani GC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22419403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Reference Production as the Probabilistic Combination of Multiple Perspectives.
    Mozuraitis M; Stevenson S; Heller D
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4():974-1008. PubMed ID: 29388246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success.
    Ferreira VS
    Learn Motiv; 2008 Jan; 49():209-246. PubMed ID: 19710948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?
    Pickering MJ; McLean JF; Gambi C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 22727911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning.
    Frank MC; Goodman ND; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 19389131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.