These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12009101)

  • 1. Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture.
    Dimech W; Roney K
    Pathology; 2002 Apr; 34(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12009101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.
    Chien TI; Kao JT; Liu HL; Lin PC; Hong JS; Hsieh HP; Chien MJ
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.
    Shayanfar N; Tobler U; von Eckardstein A; Bestmann L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis.
    Langlois MR; Delanghe JR; Steyaert SR; Everaert KC; De Buyzere ML
    Clin Chem; 1999 Jan; 45(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 9895347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.
    Mayo S; Acevedo D; Quiñones-Torrelo C; Canós I; Sancho M
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2008; 22(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18623125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures.
    Kouri TT; Kähkönen U; Malminiemi K; Vuento R; Rowan RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jul; 112(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10396282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance Evaluation and Comparison of the Fully Automated Urinalysis Analyzers UX-2000 and Cobas 6500.
    Wesarachkitti B; Khejonnit V; Pratumvinit B; Reesukumal K; Meepanya S; Pattanavin C; Wongkrajang P
    Lab Med; 2016 May; 47(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 27069030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.
    Bakan E; Bayraktutan Z; Baygutalp NK; Gul MA; Umudum FZ; Bakan N
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun; 28(2):020712. PubMed ID: 30022887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods.
    Gyamfi NKA; Osei GN; Brenyah RC; Agyemang LD; Ampomah P; Darkwah KO; Toboh E; Ephraim RKD
    Biomed Res Int; 2024; 2024():6963423. PubMed ID: 38682117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy.
    Manoni F; Tinello A; Fornasiero L; Hoffer P; Temporin V; Valverde S; Gessoni G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 48(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 20482296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.
    Lee W; Ha JS; Ryoo NH
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 26842372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D; Cong Y; Wang C; Yue J; Ma X; Lu Y; Liu P; Ma J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture).
    Hannemann-Pohl K; Kampf SC
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1999 Jul; 37(7):753-64. PubMed ID: 10510734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer.
    Ben-Ezra J; Bork L; McPherson RA
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 9550564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of automated urine analyzers using flow cytometric and digital image-based technology in routine urinalysis.
    Kucukgergin C; Ademoglu E; Omer B; Genc S
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019 Nov; 79(7):468-474. PubMed ID: 31460810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.
    Wah DT; Wises PK; Butch AW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The standardization of the report for urine cell counting-A converting factor for Sysmex UF-1000i.
    Wang L; Wang H; Zhao C; Chen C
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 May; 33(4):e22857. PubMed ID: 30916401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].
    Park J; Kim J
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.
    Altekin E; Kadiçesme O; Akan P; Kume T; Vupa O; Ergor G; Abacioglu H
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010; 24(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 20333768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urine particles analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination.
    Jiang T; Chen P; Ouyang J; Zhang S; Cai D
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Feb; 71(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.