These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12011510)

  • 1. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model.
    Kulas JT; Hannum KM
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 18250526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rater effect comparability in local independence and rater bundle models.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24950533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales.
    Meade AW
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jul; 95(4):728-43. PubMed ID: 20604592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Models and Indices for Detecting Rater Centrality.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(3):228-41. PubMed ID: 26753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments.
    Garner M; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 19299883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjusted Rasch person-fit statistics.
    Dimitrov DM; Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(2):170-83. PubMed ID: 16632900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring teacher dispositions using the DAATS battery: a multifaceted Rasch analysis of rater effect.
    Lang WS; Wilkerson JR; Rea DC; Quinn D; Batchelder HL; Englehart DS; Jennings KJ
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 24992248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting Rater Effects under Rating Designs with Varying Levels of Missingness.
    Stafford RE; Wolfe EW; Casablanca JM; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):243-257. PubMed ID: 30169333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosing a common rater halo effect using the polytomous Rasch model.
    Marais I; Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):194-211. PubMed ID: 22357123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.
    Engelhard G
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 9661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.