These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12012166)

  • 1. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.
    Mendoza J; Hansen S; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Elliott D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):760-73. PubMed ID: 16223538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planning versus online control: dynamic illusion effects in grasping?
    Franz VH
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):211-23. PubMed ID: 12858948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic.
    Franz VH; Scharnowski F; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1359-78. PubMed ID: 16366795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grasping behavior in schizophrenia suggests selective impairment in the dorsal visual pathway.
    King JP; Christensen BK; Westwood DA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2008 Nov; 117(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 19025227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.
    Westwood DA; Dubrowski A; Carnahan H; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 135(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 11156317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.