61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12012467)
1. Influence of benign cellular changes in diagnosis of cervical cancer using IR microspectroscopy.
Romeo MJ; Quinn MA; Burden FR; McNaughton D
Biopolymers; 2002; 67(4-5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12012467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of blood components from cervical smears: implications for cancer diagnosis using FTIR spectroscopy.
Romeo MJ; Wood BR; Quinn MA; McNaughton D
Biopolymers; 2003; 72(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 12400093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infrared microspectroscopy and artificial neural networks in the diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Romeo M; Burden F; Quinn M; Wood B; McNaughton D
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1998 Feb; 44(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 9551649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears.
Vooijs PG; Elias A; van der Graaf Y; Veling S
Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 3859130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FTIR microspectroscopic study of cell types and potential confounding variables in screening for cervical malignancies.
Wood BR; Quinn MA; Tait B; Ashdown M; Hislop T; Romeo M; McNaughton D
Biospectroscopy; 1998; 4(2):75-91. PubMed ID: 9557903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IR microspectroscopy: potential applications in cervical cancer screening.
Walsh MJ; German MJ; Singh M; Pollock HM; Hammiche A; Kyrgiou M; Stringfellow HF; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Cancer Lett; 2007 Feb; 246(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 16713674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of contextual analysis for computer classification of cervical smears.
Garcia GL; Kuklinski WS; Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Vooys PG; Brenner JF
Cytometry; 1987 Mar; 8(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 3556101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed account of confounding factors in interpretation of FTIR spectra of exfoliated cervical cells.
Wong PT; Senterman MK; Jackli P; Wong RK; Salib S; Campbell CE; Feigel R; Faught W; Fung Kee Fung M
Biopolymers; 2002; 67(6):376-86. PubMed ID: 12209445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study on normal and malignant tissues of cervix].
Li WX; Zheng QQ; Wang P; Li YQ; Chen GH
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1833-7. PubMed ID: 17205732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infrared spectral features of exfoliated cervical cells, cervical adenocarcinoma tissue, and an adenocarcinoma cell line (SiSo).
Neviliappan S; Fang Kan L; Tiang Lee Walter T; Arulkumaran S; Wong PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Apr; 85(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 11925139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
Ding DC; Hsu S; Chen SS; Hsu YH
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in benign cell populations in cases of cervical cancer and its precursors.
Burger G; Jutting U; Rodenacker K
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):261-71. PubMed ID: 7332155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ATR microspectroscopy with multivariate analysis segregates grades of exfoliative cervical cytology.
Walsh MJ; Singh MN; Pollock HM; Cooper LJ; German MJ; Stringfellow HF; Fullwood NJ; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2007 Jan; 352(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 17141660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of level of expression of p16 (INK4a) in endocervical lesions of uterine cervix].
Popovska S; Betova T; Tomov S; Gorchev G; Dikov T
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(5):9-13. PubMed ID: 16313047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic significance of endocervical glandular cells with "golden-yellow" mucin on pap smear.
Hata S; Mikami Y; Manabe T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Aug; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 12203873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusion is a significant diagnostic feature for the differentiation of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia from minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Hashi A; Yuminamochi T; Xu JY; Kondo T; Katoh R; Hoshi K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Aug; 36(8):535-44. PubMed ID: 18618730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytologically diagnosed Gardnerella vaginalis infection and cervical (pre)neoplasia as established in population-based cervical screening.
Klomp JM; Boon ME; Van Haaften M; Heintz AP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 199(5):480.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18565490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
