BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013131)

  • 1. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
    Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling spray drift and runoff-related inputs of pesticides to receiving water.
    Zhang X; Luo Y; Goh KS
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():48-58. PubMed ID: 29156441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Watershed-Scale Simulations of In-Stream Pesticide Concentrations from Off-Target Spray Drift.
    Winchell MF; Pai N; Brayden BH; Stone C; Whatling P; Hanzas JP; Stryker JJ
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Jan; 47(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 29415099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.
    Bird SL; Perry SG; Ray SL; Teske ME
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):672-81. PubMed ID: 11878481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Winds of change, developing a non-target plant bioassay employing field-based pesticide drift exposure: A case study with atrazine.
    Brain R; Goodwin G; Abi-Akar F; Lee B; Rodgers C; Flatt B; Lynn A; Kruger G; Perkins D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 678():239-252. PubMed ID: 31075591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measures to reduce pesticide spray drift in a small aquatic ecosystem in vineyard estate.
    Vischetti C; Cardinali A; Monaci E; Nicelli M; Ferrari F; Trevisan M; Capri E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(2-3):497-502. PubMed ID: 17936878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
    Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the role of wind in human illness due to pesticide drift in Washington state, 2000-2015.
    Kasner EJ; Prado JB; Yost MG; Fenske RA
    Environ Health; 2021 Mar; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 33722241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
    Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
    Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications.
    Teske ME; Bird SL; Esterly DM; Curbishley TB; Ray SL; Perry SG
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):659-71. PubMed ID: 11878480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
    Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.