These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013293)

  • 1. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Swem T; Fazzalari R
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operating room costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does surgeon volume matter?
    Chung WC; Lee KT; Fan PL; Tzeng DS; Chiu HC
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2006 Mar; 22(3):126-34. PubMed ID: 16602277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study.
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt CN; Encke A
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.
    Ishikawa M; Nakagawa T; Nishioka M; Ogata S; Miyauchi T; Kashiwagi Y; Uemura N; Inoue S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):497-500. PubMed ID: 16995448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Traverso LW; Hargrave K
    Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 7747829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost containment: an experience with surgeon education and universal preference cards at two institutions.
    Embick E; Bieri M; Koehler TJ; Yang A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5148-5152. PubMed ID: 31844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric setting.
    Mahomed AA; McLean V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Jun; 17(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 17570792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaping maximum benefits from minimally invasive surgery.
    Seus JD; Wood T
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Aug; 12(8):20-4, 28. PubMed ID: 10171907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Rosen MJ; Malm JA; Tarnoff M; Zuccala K; Ponsky JL
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2001 Jun; 11(3):182-4. PubMed ID: 11444748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Pontarelli EM; Grinberg GG; Isaacs RS; Morris JP; Ajayi O; Yenumula PR
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 30488194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at medicaid reimbursement rates?
    Frazee RC; Elliott VG; Larsen W; Lerner S; Minnis KW; Huber C; Nolan J; Papaconstantinou H; Smythe WR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Apr; 218(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 24529812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bariatric surgery costs and implications for hospital margins: comparing laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric banding.
    Frezza EE; Wachtel MS; Ewing BT
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Aug; 17(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 17710042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.