These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013377)

  • 21. Matching voice and face identity from static images.
    Mavica LW; Barenholtz E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23276114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual speech influences speech perception immediately but not automatically.
    Mitterer H; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 27905070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of audio-visual integration on the detection of masked speech and non-speech sounds.
    Eramudugolla R; Henderson R; Mattingley JB
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Feb; 75(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 21067852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does face familiarity influence speechreadability?
    Lander K; Davies R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):961-7. PubMed ID: 18570135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex.
    Sams M; Aulanko R; Hämäläinen M; Hari R; Lounasmaa OV; Lu ST; Simola J
    Neurosci Lett; 1991 Jun; 127(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 1881611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks.
    Lansing CR; McConkie GW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 10391620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceiving speech from inverted faces.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1047-65. PubMed ID: 8920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception.
    Skipper JI; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 15734345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing faces: how the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears.
    Bristow D; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Mattout J; Soares C; Gliga T; Baillet S; Mangin JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):905-21. PubMed ID: 18702595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Suprasegmental information affects processing of talking faces at birth.
    Guellai B; Mersad K; Streri A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Feb; 38():11-9. PubMed ID: 25531944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.
    Spence C; Ranson J; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Feb; 62(2):410-24. PubMed ID: 10723219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation.
    Campbell R; Landis T; Regard M
    Brain; 1986 Jun; 109 ( Pt 3)():509-21. PubMed ID: 3719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.