These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013383)

  • 1. Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: an omnibus analysis and its implications.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Lupiáñez J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 12013383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR.
    McKee D; Christie J; Klein R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):293-303. PubMed ID: 18266505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions.
    Taylor TL; Donnelly MP
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition of return for the discrimination of faces.
    Taylor LT; Therrien ME
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 18372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11495120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 11495119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward a conceptual clarification.
    Hasbroucq T; Guiard Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):246-66. PubMed ID: 1826315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualizing the temporal dynamics of spatial information processing responsible for the Simon effect and its amplification by inhibition of return.
    Hilchey MD; Ivanoff J; Taylor TL; Klein RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 20932500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.
    Lupiáñez J; Milán EG; Tornay FJ; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1241-54. PubMed ID: 9401458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search.
    Dodd MD; Castel AD; Pratt J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14674638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return: sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):908-19. PubMed ID: 16846287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA; De Labra C
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
    Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
    Francis L; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 8008780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
    Proctor RW; Vu KP; Nicoletti R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1318-29. PubMed ID: 14710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.