18 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013822)
1. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Okamura K; Shiotsuki K; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Akamine H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Morishita J; Yoshiura K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190378. PubMed ID: 32302229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on Detection Efficiency of Imaging Plates for Alpha Particles Using Two Types of Imaging Plate.
Qin F; He Z; Fan Z; Lu K; Li H; Luo Y; Yang X; Deng T; Cai X; Sun C; Shan J
Health Phys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38888445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.
Okamura K; Yoshiura K
Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 36(4):313-319. PubMed ID: 31302866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.
Kalathingal SM; Shrout MK; Comer C; Brady C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Mar; 39(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 20203281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical "front side" and novel "dual side" readout storage phosphors.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 16532933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
Mackenzie A; Honey ID
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
