These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12013822)

  • 21. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
    Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
    Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.
    Båth M; Sund P; Månsson LG
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2286-97. PubMed ID: 12408303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Okamura K; Shiotsuki K; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Akamine H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Morishita J; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190378. PubMed ID: 32302229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):894-904. PubMed ID: 2233577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.