BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12014169)

  • 1. Selection and modification of prefabricated implant abutments according to the desired restoration contour: a case report.
    Kourtis SG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 12014169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Custom-made laser-welded titanium implant prosthetic abutment.
    Iglesia-Puig MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):401-3. PubMed ID: 16198181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The abutment duplication technique: a novel protocol for cementable implant-supported restorations.
    Cocchetto R; Resch I; Castagna M; Vincenzi G; Celletti R
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 20664844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution and use of aluminum oxide single-tooth implant abutments: a short review and presentation of two cases.
    Heydecke G; Sierraalta M; Razzoog ME
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 12375466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
    Tischler M; Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prosthodontic technique to improve the simplicity and the efficacy of angled abutments for divergent implant situations: a technical note.
    Pampel M; Wolf R; Dietrich S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 16634505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue transfer models: the patient-dentist-laboratory connection.
    Saba S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):584-5. PubMed ID: 9785689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Customized implant abutment copings to achieve biologic, mechanical, and esthetic objectives.
    Rieder CE
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Feb; 16(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 8631607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implant-supported single-tooth restoration. Preoperative evaluation and clinical procedure.
    Boudrias P
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):497-511. PubMed ID: 8349001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indications and techniques for surgical indexing at stage I implant surgery.
    Montrose J
    Dent Today; 2004 Jul; 23(7):106-9; quiz 109. PubMed ID: 15354659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.