These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12014169)

  • 21. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
    Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Integrated Abutment Crownt, a screwless and cementless restoration for single-tooth implants: a report on a new technique.
    Urdaneta RA; Marincola M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 17451473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
    Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A modified impression technique for accurate registration of peri-implant soft tissues.
    Attard N; Barzilay I
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 69(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 12559055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rehabilitation with implant-supported suprastructures at the time of the abutment surgery: a case report.
    Knode H
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 7(3):67-73; quiz 74. PubMed ID: 7670083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictable fixed prosthodontics: technique is the key to success.
    Lowe RA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11913316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study.
    Bartlett DW; Greenwood R; Howe L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 12526273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.
    Man Y; Qu Y; Dam HG; Gong P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23395340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-generated abutments using a coded healing abutment: a two year preliminary report.
    Vafiadis DC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 19(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 17929687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impressions in implant dentistry.
    Bhakta S; Vere J; Calder I; Patel R
    Br Dent J; 2011 Oct; 211(8):361-7. PubMed ID: 22015512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional tolerances and assembly accuracy of dental implants and machined versus cast-on abutments.
    Malaguti G; Denti L; Bassoli E; Franchi I; Bortolini S; Gatto A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 19681925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.