These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12017043)

  • 41. Midwifery in a new context: expanding our reference points and embracing new representations of pregnancy and birth.
    Gagnon R
    Midwifery; 2011 Jun; 27(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 21571408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Women's experiences of intense fear related to childbirth investigated in a Swedish qualitative study.
    Eriksson C; Jansson L; Hamberg K
    Midwifery; 2006 Sep; 22(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 16603282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Perspectives on midwifery power: an exploration of the findings of the inquiry into peripartum hysterectomy at Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Ireland.
    Matthews A; Scott PA
    Nurs Inq; 2008 Jun; 15(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18476855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The power of language: a secondary analysis of a qualitative study exploring English midwives' support of mother's baby-feeding practice.
    Furber CM; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2010 Apr; 26(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 18676071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Antecedents and consequences of emotional work in midwifery: A prospective field study.
    Drach-Zahavy A; Buchnic R; Granot M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Aug; 60():168-78. PubMed ID: 27297378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and validation of the Midwife Profiling Questionnaire assessing women's preferred perinatal care professional and knowledge of midwives' legal competences.
    Vermeulen J; Peersman W; Quadvlieg L; Fobelets M; De Clercq G; Swinnen E; Beeckman K
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():23-32. PubMed ID: 29804771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Women's experiences of breech birth and disciplinary power.
    Morris S; Geraghty S; Sundin D
    J Adv Nurs; 2021 Jul; 77(7):3116-3131. PubMed ID: 33759224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Midwifery one-to-one support in labour: More than a ratio.
    Sosa GA; Crozier KE; Stockl A
    Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():230-239. PubMed ID: 29727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Representations of the midwife in the perspective of the pregnant woman].
    Martins Mde F; Remoaldo PC
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2014; 67(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 25054696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Holding Space With Women in the Labyrinth.
    Andrews E
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2017; (121):9-11. PubMed ID: 29912525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Empowering women: homoeopathy in midwifery practice.
    Cummings B
    Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 1998 Feb; 4(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9677928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Midwifery Management of Pregnant Women Who Are Obese.
    Reither M; Germano E; DeGrazia M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 May; 63(3):273-282. PubMed ID: 29778087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Being a bridge: Swedish antenatal care midwives' encounters with Somali-born women and questions of violence; a qualitative study.
    Byrskog U; Olsson P; Essén B; Allvin MK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 25591791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Midwives' experiences of caring for women with female genital mutilation: Insights and ways forward for practice in Australia.
    Dawson AJ; Turkmani S; Varol N; Nanayakkara S; Sullivan E; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2015 Sep; 28(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 25686876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Power and empowerment in nursing: a fourth theoretical approach.
    Bradbury-Jones C; Sambrook S; Irvine F
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Apr; 62(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 18394038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experiences of non-progressive and augmented labour among nulliparous women: a qualitative interview study in a Grounded Theory approach.
    Kjaergaard H; Foldgast AM; Dykes AK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():15. PubMed ID: 17662152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review.
    Healy S; Humphreys E; Kennedy C
    Women Birth; 2016 Apr; 29(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 26363668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Doing midwifery between different belief systems.
    Blaaka G; Schauer Eri T
    Midwifery; 2008 Sep; 24(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 17316937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How complimentary can midwives be about acupuncture?
    Lythgoe J
    Pract Midwife; 2012 Sep; 15(8):S10-2. PubMed ID: 23082399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Midwives' navigation and perceived power during decision-making related to augmentation of labour.
    Blix-Lindström S; Johansson E; Christensson K
    Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 17320254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.