These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12018499)
1. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues. Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 12018499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Dreisbach G; Haider H Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 16893004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Schneider DW; Logan GD Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues? Mayr U Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of recent practice on task switching. Yeung N; Monsell S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Koch I J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1474-86. PubMed ID: 11713881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition. Gade M; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition. Hübner M; Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 12696816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done? Altmann EM Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age? Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control and interference in task switching--a review. Kiesel A; Steinhauser M; Wendt M; Falkenstein M; Jost K; Philipp AM; Koch I Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 136(5):849-74. PubMed ID: 20804238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010). Grange JA; Houghton G Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 21327359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Poljac E; de Haan A; van Galen GP Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 17176657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]