These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12018499)

  • 21. Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm.
    Meiran N; Daichman A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1272-88. PubMed ID: 16532859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits.
    Lawo V; Philipp AM; Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22468851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n - 2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):579-588. PubMed ID: 29431022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 15826232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Defining task-set reconfiguration: the case of reference point switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 17546741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selective attention to perceptual dimensions and switching between dimensions.
    Meiran N; Dimov E; Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 22409145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive processes in the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task: a task-set switching account of EAST effects.
    Voss A; Klauer KC
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 17341017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task conflict effect in task switching.
    Braverman A; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 20309709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 21037168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.