These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12018500)

  • 1. Limited attention and cue order consistency affect predictive learning: a test of similarity measures.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 12018500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A test for a difference in the associability of blocked and uninformative cues in human predictive learning.
    Uengoer M; Dwyer DM; Koenig S; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):222-237. PubMed ID: 28649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Still the same in human causal reasoning: Evidence for a uniform similarity parameter in generalisation and summation.
    Whitlow JW; Brandon SE; Otero K; Christensen J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):425-442. PubMed ID: 32988296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes.
    Melchers KG; Shanks DR; Lachnit H
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):413-27; discussion 451-3. PubMed ID: 18031954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention.
    Kristjánsson A; Mackeben M; Nakayama K
    Perception; 2001; 30(11):1375-87. PubMed ID: 11768490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):25-53. PubMed ID: 14690848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to interference in human associative learning: evidence of configural processing.
    Shanks DR; Darby RJ; Charles D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Apr; 24(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 9556907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues.
    Kunar MA; John R; Sweetman H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1366-82. PubMed ID: 24199842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependent measure and time constraints modulate the competition between conflicting feature-based and rule-based generalization processes.
    Cobos PL; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Morís J; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):515-527. PubMed ID: 27841447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.
    Whitlow JW
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23505955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalization decrement in human contingency learning.
    Wheeler DS; Amundson JC; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jul; 59(7):1212-23. PubMed ID: 16769621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition.
    Waldmann MR; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 1534834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.