These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12018768)
1. A retrospective comparative study of aortic valve replacement with St. Jude medical and medtronic-hall prostheses: a 20-year follow-up study. Anttila V; Heikkinen J; Biancari F; Oikari K; Pokela R; Lepojärvi M; Salmela E; Juvonen T Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 Feb; 36(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12018768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative results with the St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall mechanical valves. Masters RG; Pipe AL; Walley VM; Keon WJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):663-71. PubMed ID: 7564432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses: a randomized comparative study. Antunes MJ Ann Thorac Surg; 1990 Nov; 50(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 2241335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis. Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standard aortic St. Jude valve at 18 years: performance profile and determinants of outcome. Lund O; Nielsen SL; Arildsen H; Ilkjaer LB; Pilegaard HK Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 May; 69(5):1459-65. PubMed ID: 10881823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitral and mitro-aortic valve replacement with Sorin Bicarbon valves compared with St. Jude Medical valves. Camilleri LF; Bailly P; Legault BJ; Miguel B; D'Agrosa-Boiteux MC; de Riberolles CM Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Jun; 9(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 11336851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude medical valve in Japanese patients. Yoshikawa K; Fukunaga S; Arinaga K; Hori H; Nakamura E; Ueda T; Tayama E; Aoyagi S Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1303-8. PubMed ID: 18355515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis. Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]