These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1202142)

  • 21. Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.
    Shen J; Reingold EM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):464-75. PubMed ID: 11414134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of object familiarity on magnitude estimates of apparent size.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 1528707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Familiarity, spatial frequency and task determinants in processing laterally presented representations of faces.
    Glass C; Bradshaw JL; Day RH; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1985 Dec; 21(4):513-31. PubMed ID: 4092482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Familiarity of objects affects susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion.
    Setti A; Chan JS
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 492(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 21262319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Jordan TR; Redwood M; Patching GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Effects of structural and naming factors of letters upon the recognition of tachistoscopic letters (author's transl)].
    Kitamori A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Apr; 52(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 7300053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency discrimination: assessing global-level and element-level units in memory.
    Hock HS; Malcus L; Hasher L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 2939180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.
    Reicher GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):522-30. PubMed ID: 1011001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional selection dilates perceived duration.
    Herbst SK; van der Meer E; Busch NA
    Perception; 2012; 41(8):883-900. PubMed ID: 23362668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual perseveration in normal and mentally retarded children.
    Hill AL; Silverman WP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 643498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feedforward and quick recurrent processes in early visual cortex revealed by TMS?
    de Graaf TA; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 22032946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1305-17. PubMed ID: 9865072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli.
    Hellström Å; Cederström C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 24604542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic spatial patterns of the sense of familiarity: Hierarchical modelling based on eye-tracking experiments.
    Miyoshi K; Ashida H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):832-846. PubMed ID: 29792373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception.
    Brown SW
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 7885802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apparent reversals of a rotating mask: a new demonstration of cognition in perception.
    Klopfer DS
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jun; 49(6):522-30. PubMed ID: 1857626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.