These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12022099)

  • 1. Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery.
    Ellis E; Graham J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jun; 60(6):642-5; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 12022099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandibular surgery.
    Herford AS; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 56(11):1261-5. PubMed ID: 9820213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    Singh V; Kumar I; Bhagol A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of locking plates/screw system in mandibular fracture surgery.
    Nayak SS; Pushpalatha C; Tammanavar PS; Naduwinmani SL; Mohan M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 23811649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.
    Kirkpatrick D; Gandhi R; Van Sickels JE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 12684964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of 2.3 mm locking plate system vs conventional 2.0 mm non locking plate system for mandibular condyle fracture fixation: a seven year retrospective study.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wu RH; Zhuang QW; Gu QP; Meng J
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015; 19(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 25807421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.
    Yang L; Patil PM
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):552-6. PubMed ID: 25753869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using Active Locking Plates: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Madey SM; Tsai S; Fitzpatrick DC; Earley K; Lutsch M; Bottlang M
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():1-10. PubMed ID: 28852327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.
    Zhan S; Jiang Y; Cheng Z; Ye J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2094-7. PubMed ID: 25304139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working length and proximal screw constructs in plate osteosynthesis of distal femur fractures.
    Harvin WH; Oladeji LO; Della Rocca GJ; Murtha YM; Volgas DA; Stannard JP; Crist BD
    Injury; 2017 Nov; 48(11):2597-2601. PubMed ID: 28889934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is lag screw fixation superior to plate fixation to treat fractures of the mandibular symphysis?
    Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):875-82. PubMed ID: 22209100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of lag screws for fractures of the mandibular body.
    Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1314-6. PubMed ID: 8941182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.
    Kumar I; Singh V; Singh A; Arora V; Bajaj A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 23184064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model.
    Poon CC; Verco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
    Chritah A; Lazow SK; Berger JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1737-41. PubMed ID: 16297694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
    Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective trial of poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid co-polymer plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ferretti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 37(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 18295449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a malleable noncompression miniplate.
    Potter J; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Mar; 57(3):288-92; discussion 292-3. PubMed ID: 10077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lag screw fixation of mandibular fractures.
    Ellis E
    J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1997; 3(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 11951267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.