BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12022265)

  • 1. A proposal to solve the comparability problem in cost-utility analysis.
    Bleichrodt H; Herrero C; Pinto JL
    J Health Econ; 2002 May; 21(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 12022265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distribution problem in economic evaluation: income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes.
    Donaldson C; Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Jan; 11(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 11788982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.
    Dolan P; Gudex C; Kind P; Williams A
    J Health Econ; 1996 Apr; 15(2):209-31. PubMed ID: 10159110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B
    Health Policy; 1991 Feb; 17(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 10113574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome measurement in economic evaluation.
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B; Karlsson G
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 8880165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective.
    Johannesson M; O'Conor RM
    Health Policy; 1997 Mar; 39(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 10165464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: when is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis?
    Bleichrodt H; Quiggin J
    J Health Econ; 1999 Dec; 18(6):681-708. PubMed ID: 10847930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Productivity costs, time costs and health-related quality of life: a response to the Erasmus Group.
    Weinstein MC; Siegel JE; Garber AM; Lipscomb J; Luce BR; Manning WG; Torrance GW
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 9353651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.
    Brazier J; Deverill M; Green C; Harper R; Booth A
    Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(9):i-iv, 1-164. PubMed ID: 10392311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The missing link: on the line between C and E.
    Brouwer WB; Rutten FF
    Health Econ; 2003 Aug; 12(8):629-36. PubMed ID: 12898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of pharmacoeconomics in prescribing research. Part 4: is cost-utility analysis a useful tool?
    Brinsmead R; Hill S
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2003 Aug; 28(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 12911687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A second opinion. Cost-utility analysis and varying preferences for health.
    Mooney G; Jan S
    Health Policy; 1997 Sep; 41(3):201-3; discussion 203-5. PubMed ID: 10170089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values.
    Gold MR; Franks P; McCoy KI; Fryback DG
    Med Care; 1998 Jun; 36(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 9630120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accounting for the missing opportunity costs in incremental cost-outcome analysis.
    Oliver A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 14619248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-utility analysis studies of depression management: a systematic review.
    Pirraglia PA; Rosen AB; Hermann RC; Olchanski NV; Neumann P
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Dec; 161(12):2155-62. PubMed ID: 15569883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A further examination of the problem of double-counting in incremental cost-utility analyses.
    Ungar WJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Jun; 16(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 27113196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in CUA' by Parkin and Devlin. A response: 'yes there is a case, but what does it add to ordinal data?'.
    Brazier J; McCabe C
    Health Econ; 2007 Jun; 16(6):645-7; discussion 649-51. PubMed ID: 17535007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Willingness-to-pay (WTP): the new-old kid on the economic evaluation block.
    Gafni A
    Can J Nurs Res; 2001 Jun; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11928155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.