109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12023151)
1. Margins for translational and rotational uncertainties: a probability-based approach.
Remeijer P; Rasch C; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):464-74. PubMed ID: 12023151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.
Stroom JC; de Boer HC; Huizenga H; Visser AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(4):905-19. PubMed ID: 10098447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of nonuniform CTV to PTV margin expansion incorporating both rotational and translational uncertainties.
Miao J; Xu Y; Tian Y; Liu Z; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):78-86. PubMed ID: 31793203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed?
Antolak JA; Rosen II
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1165-70. PubMed ID: 10421551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The need for rotational margins in intensity-modulated radiotherapy and a new method for planning target volume design.
Langer MP; Papiez L; Spirydovich S; Thai V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Dec; 63(5):1592-603. PubMed ID: 16297718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of microscopic disease on the tumor control probability in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Siedschlag C; Boersma L; van Loon J; Rossi M; van Baardwijk A; Gilhuijs K; Stroom J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 21955665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An optimisation algorithm for determination of treatment margins around moving and deformable targets.
Redpath AT; Muren LP
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 16209894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generating amorphous target margins in radiation therapy to promote maximal target coverage with minimal target size.
Yock AD
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Nov; 166():1-8. PubMed ID: 30415709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A concept for anisotropic PTV margins including rotational setup uncertainties and its impact on the tumor control probability in canine brain tumors.
Radonic S; Besserer J; Bley CR; Schneider U; Meier V
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Sep; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 35981496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiotherapy margin design with particular consideration of high curvature CTVs.
Herschtal A; Kron T; Fox C
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):684-97. PubMed ID: 19378729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy.
Bel A; van Herk M; Lebesque JV
Med Phys; 1996 Sep; 23(9):1537-45. PubMed ID: 8892251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of current clinical target volume definitions for glioblastoma using cell-based dosimetry stochastic methods.
Moghaddasi L; Bezak E; Harriss-Phillips W
Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20150155. PubMed ID: 26140450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of the shape and size of the clinical target volume on the planning target volume margin.
Zheng B; Huang Z; Li J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109244. PubMed ID: 25275442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
