237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12023153)
1. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of post-implant edema on the rectal dose in prostate brachytherapy.
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 10524408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of postimplant edema on the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy.
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):661-4. PubMed ID: 10837949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of postimplant edema on V(100) and D(90) in prostate brachytherapy: can implant quality be predicted on day 0?
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jul; 53(3):610-21. PubMed ID: 12062604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition.
Waterman FM; Yue N; Corn BW; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jul; 41(5):1069-77. PubMed ID: 9719117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion.
Taussky D; Austen L; Toi A; Yeung I; Williams T; Pearson S; McLean M; Pond G; Crook J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 15989997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of edema on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using CT/MRI fusion.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Uno H; Ohtakara K; Miyoshi T; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 17869675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brachytherapy in patients with small prostate glands.
Loblaw DA; Wallner K; Dibiase S; Russell K; Blasko J; Ellis W
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 10798802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Greater postimplant swelling in small-volume prostate glands: implications for dosimetry, treatment planning, and operating room technique.
Chung E; Stenmark MH; Evans C; Narayana V; McLaughlin PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1944-8. PubMed ID: 21640498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1067-75. PubMed ID: 10841411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of real-time intraoperative ultrasound-based dosimetry with postoperative computed tomography-based dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy.
Nag S; Shi P; Liu B; Gupta N; Bahnson RR; Wang JZ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17996395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postimplant rectal dosimetry is not dependent on 103Pd or 125I seed activity.
Merrick GS; Sylvester J; Grimm P; Allen ZA; Butler WM; Reed JL; Khanjian J
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20153264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postimplantation dosimetric analysis of permanent transperineal prostate implantation: improved dose distributions with an intraoperative computer-optimized conformal planning technique.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen G; Venkatraman ES; Fung AY; Furhang E; Silvern D; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Sep; 48(2):601-8. PubMed ID: 10974481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postimplant analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy: evidence for a learning curve in the first year at a single institution.
Lee WR; deGuzman AF; Bare RL; Marshall MG; McCullough DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 10656377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Nath R; Waterman FM
Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 10360539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
