These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12023503)

  • 1. Power for T-test comparisons of unbalanced cluster exposure studies.
    Hoover DR
    J Urban Health; 2002 Jun; 79(2):278-94. PubMed ID: 12023503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters.
    Hemming K; Girling AJ; Sitch AJ; Marsh J; Lilford RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 21718530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size calculation for treatment effects in randomized trials with fixed cluster sizes and heterogeneous intraclass correlations and variances.
    Candel MJ; van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):557-73. PubMed ID: 25519890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal design of cluster randomized trials allowing unequal allocation of clusters and unequal cluster size between arms.
    Copas AJ; Hooper R
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(25):5474-5486. PubMed ID: 34312902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of imbalance and intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes when the available number of clusters is fixed in advance.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Skinner CS; Ahn D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jul; 30(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 19348965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation.
    Hsieh FY; Lavori PW; Cohen HJ; Feussner JR
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):239-57. PubMed ID: 12971199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using hierarchical cluster models to systematically identify groups of jobs with similar occupational questionnaire response patterns to assist rule-based expert exposure assessment in population-based studies.
    Friesen MC; Shortreed SM; Wheeler DC; Burstyn I; Vermeulen R; Pronk A; Colt JS; Baris D; Karagas MR; Schwenn M; Johnson A; Armenti KR; Silverman DT; Yu K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 25477475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting power analyses for ANOVA and ANCOVA in between-subjects designs.
    Algina J; Olejnik S
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):288-314. PubMed ID: 12971201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for choosing an analysis method that controls Type I error for unbalanced cluster sample designs with Gaussian outcomes.
    Johnson JL; Kreidler SM; Catellier DJ; Murray DM; Muller KE; Glueck DH
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(27):3531-45. PubMed ID: 26089186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plant Disease Severity Assessment-How Rater Bias, Assessment Method, and Experimental Design Affect Hypothesis Testing and Resource Use Efficiency.
    Chiang KS; Bock CH; Lee IH; El Jarroudi M; Delfosse P
    Phytopathology; 2016 Dec; 106(12):1451-1464. PubMed ID: 27532427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies.
    Hu Y; Hoover DR
    J Biom Biostat; 2018; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31360594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.