264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12023701)
1. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.
Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fewer x-rays while maintaining quality of clinical care using clinical protocols for physical diagnosis of ankle injuries].
van Riet YE; van der Schouw YT; van der Werken C
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 10682650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.
Perry S; Raby N; Grant PT
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Jul; 16(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10417931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.
Hedelin H; Goksör LÅ; Karlsson J; Stjernström S
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1686-9. PubMed ID: 24157071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
Clark KD; Tanner S
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2003 Apr; 19(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12698029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.
McBride KL
Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():459-65. PubMed ID: 9116517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.
Papacostas E; Malliaropoulos N; Papadopoulos A; Liouliakis C
Br J Sports Med; 2001 Dec; 35(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 11726486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners.
Mann CJ; Grant I; Guly H; Hughes P
J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 Sep; 15(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 9785158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment.
Verma S; Hamilton K; Hawkins HH; Kothari R; Singal B; Buncher R; Nguyen P; O'Neill M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):825-7. PubMed ID: 9275906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
