376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12024143)
1. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures.
Rösch T; Meining A; Frühmorgen S; Zillinger C; Schusdziarra V; Hellerhoff K; Classen M; Helmberger H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):870-6. PubMed ID: 12024143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures.
Heinzow HS; Kammerer S; Rammes C; Wessling J; Domagk D; Meister T
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 20(30):10495-503. PubMed ID: 25132767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study.
Rösch T; Hofrichter K; Frimberger E; Meining A; Born P; Weigert N; Allescher HD; Classen M; Barbur M; Schenck U; Werner M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Sep; 60(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 15332029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US, MRCP, CCT and ERCP: a comparative study in 131 patients with suspected biliary obstruction.
Ferrari FS; Fantozzi F; Tasciotti L; Vigni F; Scotto F; Frasci P
Med Sci Monit; 2005 Mar; 11(3):MT8-18. PubMed ID: 15735576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic ultrasonography can diagnose distal biliary strictures without a mass on computed tomography.
Saifuku Y; Yamagata M; Koike T; Hitomi G; Kanke K; Watanabe H; Murohisa T; Tamano M; Iijima M; Kubota K; Hiraishi H
World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 16(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 20066744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up.
Katz LH; Benjaminov O; Belinki A; Geler A; Braun M; Knizhnik M; Aizner S; Shaharabani E; Sulkes J; Shabtai E; Pappo O; Atar E; Tur-Kaspa R; Mor E; Ben-Ari Z
Clin Transplant; 2010; 24(5):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21039885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Navigator-triggered isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of malignant biliary obstructions: comparison with direct cholangiography.
Choi JY; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SH; Lee MW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 18050328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Same-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter experience.
Jo JH; Cho CM; Jun JH; Chung MJ; Kim TH; Seo DW; Kim J; Park DH;
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Apr; 34(4):799-805. PubMed ID: 30378169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraductal US in evaluation of biliary strictures without a mass lesion on CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging: significance of focal wall thickening and extrinsic compression at the stricture site.
Krishna NB; Saripalli S; Safdar R; Agarwal B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 17451708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraductal US is a useful adjunct to ERCP for distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures.
Farrell RJ; Agarwal B; Brandwein SL; Underhill J; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Nov; 56(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 12397276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease.
Varghese JC; Farrell MA; Courtney G; Osborne H; Murray FE; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Aug; 54(8):513-20. PubMed ID: 10484218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Durup J; Pless TK; Mortensen MB
Endoscopy; 2003 Dec; 35(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 14648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
