These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12024177)

  • 1. Bell Labs launches inquiry into allegations of data duplication.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):367-8. PubMed ID: 12024177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.
    Service RF
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
    Service RF
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific credit and credibility.
    Grant PM
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation into nanotechnology papers expands.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6888):473. PubMed ID: 12037526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misconduct in physics: time to wise up?
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):120-1. PubMed ID: 12110859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fraud inquiry leaves online paper in the ether.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6901):907. PubMed ID: 12198509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misconduct finding at Bell Labs shakes physics community.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):419-21. PubMed ID: 12368818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report from the Scientific Integrity Advisor: issues arising in 2005 and 2006.
    Daroff RB
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(21):1841-2. PubMed ID: 17515547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica and scientific misconduct.
    Poljak M
    Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2009 Sep; 18(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 19784521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research misconduct and redundant publication.
    Rajagopalan M
    Gut; 1998 Mar; 42(3):449. PubMed ID: 9577360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct: our first (known) case.
    Pasternak J
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2014; 12(4):vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25628187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Scott Reuben saga: one last retraction.
    White PF; Rosow CE; Shafer SL;
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 21350225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.