BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12025266)

  • 1. [Unconditioned logistic regression and sample size: a bibliographic review].
    Ortega Calvo M; Cayuela Domínguez A
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2002; 76(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 12025266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation.
    Vittinghoff E; Sen S; McCulloch CE
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):541-57. PubMed ID: 19065627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
    Vaeth M; Skovlund E
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
    Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction to the use of regression models in epidemiology.
    Bender R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 471():179-95. PubMed ID: 19109780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
    Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variable selection for logistic regression using a prediction-focused information criterion.
    Claeskens G; Croux C; Van Kerckhoven J
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 17156270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment.
    James KE; White RF; Kraemer HC
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):3019-35. PubMed ID: 16149128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation program for power and sample size determination in logistic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms when the response variable is subject to misclassification.
    Yamada T; Kinukawa N; Nakamura T; Nose Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Oct; 96(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19403193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond logistic regression: structural equations modelling for binary variables and its application to investigating unobserved confounders.
    Kupek E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():13. PubMed ID: 16539711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding data in clinical research: a simple graphical display for plotting data (up to four independent variables) after binary logistic regression analysis.
    Mesa JL
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 62(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 14962632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of sample size for stroke trials assessing functional outcome: comparison of binary and ordinal approaches.
    Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration
    Int J Stroke; 2008 May; 3(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 18705999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample-size requirements for comparisons of two groups on repeated observations of a binary outcome.
    Leon AC
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 14994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal sample size determinations from an industry perspective based on the expected value of information.
    Willan AR
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19029207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of lead, mercury, mirex, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, hexachlorobenzene, and polychlorinated biphenyls to timing of menarche among Akwesasne Mohawk girls.
    Denham M; Schell LM; Deane G; Gallo MV; Ravenscroft J; DeCaprio AP;
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e127-34. PubMed ID: 15653789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between logistic regression and neural networks to predict death in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency room.
    Jaimes F; Farbiarz J; Alvarez D; Martínez C
    Crit Care; 2005 Apr; 9(2):R150-6. PubMed ID: 15774048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.