These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12025367)

  • 1. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors.
    Calvo MG; Meseguer E
    Span J Psychol; 2002 May; 5(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 12025367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1151-65. PubMed ID: 24205888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.
    Plummer P; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):275-83. PubMed ID: 23937235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Rotstein NP; Colombo O; Mandolesi P; Politi LE; Agamennoni O
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():143-51. PubMed ID: 25080188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word length effects on novel words: evidence from eye movements.
    Lowell R; Morris RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 24092359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading.
    Sereno SC; Hand CJ; Shahid A; Yao B; O'Donnell PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):302-313. PubMed ID: 28481189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J; Murray WS; Paul SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):601-18. PubMed ID: 22643118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability.
    Wang HC; Pomplun M; Chen M; Ko H; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1374-86. PubMed ID: 19998069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.
    AlJassmi MA; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; White SJ; Paterson KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 34632557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An eye-movement-contingent probe paradigm.
    Kambe G; Duffy SA; Clifton C; Rayner K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 14620361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
    Reingold EM; Rayner K
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):742-6. PubMed ID: 16984288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word's Contextual Predictability and Its Character Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Liu Z; Liu X; Tong W; Fu F
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1833. PubMed ID: 32982821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.