BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12025538)

  • 1. Capping AIDS benefits: does Title III of the ADA regulate the content of insurance policies?
    Olender C
    Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 12025538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of health plan benefits payable to catastrophically ill employees.
    Hogan JM
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jan; 8(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10171335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERISA preemption and its effects on capping the health benefits of individuals with AIDS: a demonstration of why the United States health and insurance systems require substantial reform.
    Palmer L
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Jul; (185):9-49. PubMed ID: 10171923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold barriers to Title I and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act: discrimination against mental illness in long-term disability benefits.
    Firak NL
    J Law Health; 1997-1998; 12(2):205-308. PubMed ID: 10539295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolving limitations on coverage for AIDS: implications for health insurers and employers under the ADA and ERISA.
    Mansfield NR
    Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 11475508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why the capping of AIDS benefits by self-funded employer welfare benefit plans should be actionable under Section 510 of ERISA.
    Wells KL
    Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Jun; ():17-25. PubMed ID: 10538267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AIDS case raises questions about ERISA. Greenberg v. H&H Music.
    Bus Health; 1992 Dec; 10(14):20-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10183807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AIDS--ADA--handicap discrimination--ERISA plan--preemption. McNeil v. Time Insurance Company, 205 F.3d 179 (5th Cir. 2000).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):66-7. PubMed ID: 11521553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of ADA non-discrimination principles to self-insured health plans: do "AIDS caps" violate the law?
    Morgan PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 11(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 10172301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disability discrimination and Parker v. Metropolitan Life: separate, but equal?
    Wall BW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9554716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insurance options under ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
    Kornblau BL; Soll MA; Ellexson MA
    HRMAGAZINE; 1992 Mar; 37(3):100-3. PubMed ID: 10170982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where the Supreme Court feared to tread: closing the loopholes in ERISA section 510.
    Klym TC
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Nov; 26(11):321-7, 352. PubMed ID: 10171939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employer-sponsored health benefit plan may be subject to liability under ADA for limiting coverage for AIDS-related illnesses.
    Miller TA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 10172260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McGann offspring: employers may retroactively limit health insurance, says 11th Circuit. Owens v. Storehouse, Inc.
    Margolis RE
    Healthspan; 1993 Apr; 10(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 10183931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AIDS cap on medical insurance violates the ADA, judge rules.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Jun; 12(12):1, 10. PubMed ID: 11364402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits limiting healthcare coverage.
    Laddaga LA; Roney MA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Aug; 48(8):46, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10171905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health-care cap.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1996 May; 11(8):12. PubMed ID: 11363454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It doesn't add up: the broken promises of lifetime health benefits, Medicare, and accounting rule FAS 106 do not equal satisfactory medical coverage for retirees.
    Ossi GJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):233-63. PubMed ID: 9068243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More health plan requirements under ADA.
    Pranschke SC
    J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(6):17-23. PubMed ID: 10171894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High court won't review AIDS medical cap on ex-employee.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Jun; 12(11):11. PubMed ID: 11364385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.