These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Home births. Beland P RCM Midwives J; 2002 Jun; 5(6):193. PubMed ID: 12098938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse is guilty of misconduct. Pract Midwife; 2000 Dec; 3(11):7. PubMed ID: 12026572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Home birth--a realistic possibility? Lee B RCM Midwives; 2003 Jun; 6(6):256-9. PubMed ID: 12830626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Home sweet home. A place to deliver, care for, and raise our children. Chmell A J Leg Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 22439712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Just waiting to be hauled over the coals': home birth midwifery in Ireland. OBoyle C Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):988-95. PubMed ID: 23415356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling. Chervenak FA; Grünebaum A; Arabin B; McCullough LB BJOG; 2017 Sep; 124(10):1472-1473. PubMed ID: 28440904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The birth of a midwife (with a long latent phase). Waechter M Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (72):36, 67. PubMed ID: 15651452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. SA government proposes to limit homebirth practitioners. Qld Nurse; 2013 Oct; 32(5):37. PubMed ID: 24325023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women may birth alone if independent midwifery is outlawed. Pract Midwife; 2013; 16(7):9. PubMed ID: 23909194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating midwifery. Parallels in Texas and British Columbia. Johnson G Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):29-31. PubMed ID: 11984896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The state of midwifery in British Columbia, Canada. Westfall R Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2002; (62):51-5. PubMed ID: 12101926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethico-legal issues in home birth. Jones S RCM Midwives; 2003 Mar; 6(3):126-8. PubMed ID: 12677851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is this the end of independent midwifery? Anderson T Pract Midwife; 2007 Feb; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 17323798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2015/8 Case of Dubská and Krejzová v. The Czech Republic, 11 December 2014, nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12 (Former Fifth Section). Dute J Eur J Health Law; 2015 Apr; 22(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 26399057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Midwifery and the constitution. Smith EL Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (65):33-5. PubMed ID: 12710149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwifery threatened by new regulatory framework. Pract Midwife; 2000 Dec; 3(11):6. PubMed ID: 12026571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arizona regulations. Cleckner W Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2011; (99):6. PubMed ID: 21999045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Time for an independent voice. Taylor M Pract Midwife; 2004 Jan; 7(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 14969036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]