131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12027349)
1. The bizarreness effect and individual differences in imaging ability.
Toyota H
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):533-40. PubMed ID: 12027349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
McDaniel MA; Einstein GO; DeLosh EL; May CP; Brady P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):422-435. PubMed ID: 7738508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-corrected elaboration and spacing effects in incidental memory.
Toyota H
Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):498-508. PubMed ID: 16826672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential Coherence in Sentence Pairs Enhances Imagery during Comprehension: An Individual Differences Study.
Madden-Lombardi C; Jouen AL; Dominey PF; Ventre-Dominey J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138269. PubMed ID: 26383115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.
Einstein GO; McDaniel MA; Lackey S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 2522138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of visual imagery in the retention of information from sentences.
Drose GS; Allen GL
J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):37-60. PubMed ID: 8021631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between personality variables and bizarreness effects in free recall.
Moss BJ; Worthen JB; Haydel LA; Mahon BD; Savoy SC
Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 18510131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery.
Riefer DM; Rouder JN
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 1435263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of imaging ability on word transformation.
Allen PA; Wallace B; Loschiavo F
Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7968552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the picture bizarreness effect a generation effect?
Marchal A; Nicolas S
Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):331-40. PubMed ID: 11026434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in the representation of sentences in memory.
Merrill EC; Bilsky LH
Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Jul; 95(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 2386631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tests of a cognitive-resource-allocation account of the bizarreness effect.
Worthen JB; Garcia-Rivas G; Green CR; Vidos RA
J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):117-44. PubMed ID: 10843256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sentence imagery and recall: an electroencephalographic evaluation of hemispheric processing in males and females.
Haynes WO; Moore WH
Cortex; 1981 Apr; 17(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 7273802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in the semantic constraint of spreading activation of memory across three age groups.
Toyota H
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 11065297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities.
Crawford HJ; Allen SN
Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image-formation time is not related to recall of bizarre and plausible images.
Fritsch T; Larsen JD
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1259-66. PubMed ID: 2399099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
