BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12027349)

  • 21. The influence of contextual constraints on recall for words within sentences.
    McFalls EL; Schwanenflugel PJ
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 11868195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modality effects in sentence recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
    Prior A; Bentin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Knowledge and ability factors underlying simple learning by accretion.
    Tirre WC
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1991 Feb; 117(1):91-126. PubMed ID: 2044949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Self-corrected elaboration effects on incidental memory.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Oct; 99(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 15560341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes across age groups in self-choice elaboration effects on incidental memory.
    Toyota H; Konishi T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Aug; 99(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 15446638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interruption and bizarreness effects in the recall of script-based text.
    Davidson D; Larson SL; Luo Z; Burden MJ
    Memory; 2000 Jul; 8(4):217-34. PubMed ID: 10932792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Humour mediates the facilitative effect of bizarreness in delayed recall.
    Worthen JB; Deschamps JD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 99(Pt 4):461-71. PubMed ID: 18433519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in the constraints of semantic and syntactic congruity on memory across three age groups.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):691-8. PubMed ID: 11453195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bizarre imagery in paired-associate learning: an effective mnemonic aid with mixed context, delayed testing, and self-paced conditions.
    Iaccino JF; Sowa SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 2928063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes across age groups in self-choice elaboration and incidental memory.
    Toyota H; Tatsumi T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Apr; 96(2):517-27. PubMed ID: 12776835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determinants of the vividness of visual imagery: the effects of delayed recall, stimulus affect and individual differences.
    Bywaters M; Andrade J; Turpin G
    Memory; 2004 Jul; 12(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 15487543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Actionality and mental imagery in children's comprehension of declaratives.
    Thibaut JP; Rondal JA; Käens AM
    J Child Lang; 1995 Feb; 22(1):189-209. PubMed ID: 7759578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism.
    Faust M; Babkoff H; Kravetz S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Apr; 17(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 7629266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of imaging sentences on concurrent unimanual performance.
    Lempert H
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(5):835-9. PubMed ID: 3431678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Memory discrimination for self-performed and imagined acts: bizarreness effects in false recognition.
    Worthen JB; Wood VV
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 11216321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention blinks for selection, not perception or memory: reading sentences and reporting targets.
    Potter MC; Wyble B; Olejarczyk J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1915-23. PubMed ID: 22022894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The bizarreness effect: dissociation between item and source memory.
    Macklin CB; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):682-9. PubMed ID: 16191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of sentence form on the construction of mental plans from procedural discourse.
    Dixon P; Harrison K; Taylor D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 8364535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.