BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12029291)

  • 21. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attributes and practices of oral and maxillofacial radiology departments in US and Canadian dental schools.
    Kantor ML; Schneider D; O Carroll MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 11174580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A rare earth screen-film system for dental panoramic radiography.
    Keur JJ
    Aust Dent J; 1983 Apr; 28(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 6577821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations.
    Greig DG
    Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
    Fuhrmann AW
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Radiation protection and quality assurance in dental radiography. A treatise from the European Community].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 9289750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations.
    Nakfoor CA; Brooks SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):510-3. PubMed ID: 1574315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A questionnaire study to derive information on the working environment, clinical training, use of ancillary staff and optimization of patient radiation dose within UK dental practice.
    Orafi I; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):763-72. PubMed ID: 22486707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey.
    Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Bayirli G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 15961596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survey of dental radiographical practice in states of Punjab and Haryana in India.
    Sheikh S; Pallagatti S; Singla I; Gupta R; Aggarwal A; Singh R; Gupta D
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Feb; 5(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 23233351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
    Clarijs T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. DENTAL INTRAORAL EXPOSURES IN PORTUGAL: FROM 1990 TO 2018.
    Trindade H; Coutinho G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):452-455. PubMed ID: 30916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.