These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12030098)
1. Meeting the needs of an ever-demanding market. Rigby R Med Device Technol; 2002 Apr; 13(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 12030098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical packaging: more for less? Andrews J; Hunt N Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 10387624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of material selection on the design of packaging machinery. Merritt JP Med Device Technol; 2009; 20(2):12-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 19405337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Materials for preformed rigid-tray packages. Pilchik R Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 10387623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to validate a packaging process. Turner M Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 15154335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A packaging update. Recycling, testing, and pricing. Baker MC Med Device Technol; 1995 May; 6(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 10155385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Faster introduction of cost-effective packaging films. Hunt N Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 11547679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validating the packaging process using factorial designs. Merritt J Med Device Technol; 1997 Oct; 8(8):22-8. PubMed ID: 10174273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adhesive and nonadhesive systems for health-care packaging. Pilchik R Med Device Technol; 2000 Apr; 11(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 10947334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A potential method for the specification of microbial barrier properties. Scholla MH; Hackett ET; Rudys S; Michels C; Bletsos J Med Device Technol; 2000 Apr; 11(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 10947325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latest medical applications of polypropylene. Van Lierde S Med Device Technol; 2004 Jun; 15(5):33-4. PubMed ID: 15285487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface analysis of packaging materials. Part II. West RH Med Device Technol; 1996 May; 7(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10163374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An international standard for terminally sterilized medical device packaging. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1997; 8(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 10169623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customized packs yield major savings. Birk S Mater Manag Health Care; 2009 Apr; 18(4):34-6. PubMed ID: 20229837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface analysis of packaging materials. Part I. West RH Med Device Technol; 1996 Apr; 7(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 10163369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new microbial barrier test for porous medical packaging materials. Fielding P Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 11547680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Package seals. Causes and avoidance of defects. Hall R Med Device Technol; 1995 May; 6(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 10155383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The functionality and cost advantages of high-performance polymers. Young M Med Device Technol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):12-5. PubMed ID: 14528807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]