These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. The path of visual attention. Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rotated alphanumeric characters do not automatically activate frontoparietal areas subserving mental rotation. Weiss MM; Wolbers T; Peller M; Witt K; Marshall L; Buchel C; Siebner HR Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1063-73. PubMed ID: 18977449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements. Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multiple reference frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror. Laeng B; Brennen T; Johannessen K; Holmen K; Elvestad R Cortex; 2002 Sep; 38(4):511-28. PubMed ID: 12465666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects. Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rotation or translation of auditory space in neglect? A case study of chronic right-sided neglect. Kerkhoff G; Schindler I; Artinger F; Zoelch C; Bublak P; Finke K Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 16256151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of local/global processing with stimulus presentation in the peripheral visual hemifields. Lux S; Marshall JC; Ritzl A; Weiss PH; Pietrzyk U; Shah NJ; Zilles K; Fink GR Neuroscience; 2004; 124(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 14960344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect. Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Understanding the effects of moving visual stimuli on unilateral neglect following stroke. Plummer P; Dunai J; Morris ME Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16466838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli. Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors. Porac C; Searleman A; Karagiannakis K Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug; 61(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16527384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Searching with unilateral neglect. Pavlovskaya M; Ring H; Groswasser Z; Hochstein S J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):745-56. PubMed ID: 12167259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. One good turn deserves another: an event-related brain potential study of rotated mirror-normal letter discriminations. Hamm JP; Johnson BW; Corballis MC Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):810-20. PubMed ID: 15037059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]