177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1203211)
1. Progression in response patterns of fetal heart rate throughout labour.
Liu DT; Thomas G; Blackwell RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1975 Dec; 82(12):943-51. PubMed ID: 1203211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceleration patterns of the fetal heart rate before and during labour.
Odendaal HJ; Sandenbergh HA
S Afr Med J; 1977 Sep; 52(12):473-5. PubMed ID: 905907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. II. Late decelerations.
Cibils LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Nov; 123(5):473-94. PubMed ID: 1180296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relevance of antenatal and intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns to fetal outcome.
Liu DT; Blackwell RJ; Tukel S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Apr; 85(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 638096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. II. Multifactorial analysis of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Jordaan HV; Segreti A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 133(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 35003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic monitoring of the fetal heart rate and uterine contractions during cesarean section under balanced anesthesia.
Timor-Tritsch I; Gergely Z; Abramovici H; Brandes JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 948373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of fetal heart rate reactivity with a positive oxytocin challenge test.
Braly P; Freeman RK
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Dec; 50(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 927760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test.
Bissonnette JM; Johnson K; Toomey C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 484615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. V. Variable decelerations.
Cibils LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Dec; 132(7):791-805. PubMed ID: 717490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The predictive value of cardiotocography.
Rossavik IK
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1980; 69(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 7377738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deceleration/contraction ratios as an index of fetal health during labor.
Lin CC; Schulman H; Saldana LR
Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jun; 51(6):666-70. PubMed ID: 26900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interpretation of the fetal heart rate during labour.
Van Lierde M; De Muylder X; Thomas K
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1981 Dec; 32(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 7324849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VI. Prognostic significance of accelerations.
Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 142(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 7065019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal response to cephalopelvic disproportion.
Stewart KS; Philpott RH
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Aug; 87(8):641-9. PubMed ID: 7426524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal and abnormal antenatal ultrasonic cardiographic patterns.
Merkur H
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Jul; 86(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 476019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of fetal heart rate acceleration patterns.
Lee CY; Di Loreto PC; O'Lane JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 45(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1118084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Classification and prognosis of fetal heart rate patterns.
Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Jordaan HV; Segreti A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 133(7):762-72. PubMed ID: 434020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of fetal heart rate patterns and fetal pH with neonatal outcome.
Tejani N; Mann LI; Bhakthavathsalan A
Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Oct; 48(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 9605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. V. Fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor.
Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 140(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7246660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prolonged end-stage fetal heart rate deceleration: a reanalysis.
Herbert CM; Boehm FH
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 7219908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
