463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12033572)
21. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enhancement of breast calcification visualization and detection using a modified PG method in Cone Beam Breast CT.
Liu J; Ning R; Cai W; Benitez RB
J Xray Sci Technol; 2012; 20(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 22398591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast CT.
Glick SJ
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.
Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 11243347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Objective assessment of image quality in conventional and digital mammography taking into account dynamic range.
Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):380-2. PubMed ID: 15933141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization.
Jaffray DA; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1311-23. PubMed ID: 10902561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dual-energy mammography: simulation studies.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(18):4497-515. PubMed ID: 16953039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.
Kalender WA; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Lück F; Rößler AC; Wenkel E
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 27306559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography.
Sabol JM; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):887-98. PubMed ID: 8798174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scatter correction for clinical cone beam CT breast imaging based on breast phantom studies.
Cai W; Ning R; Conover D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2011; 19(1):91-109. PubMed ID: 21422591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
