These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12033583)

  • 21. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results.
    Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Cooper VN; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2408-16. PubMed ID: 11099211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Sechopoulos I; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():99-107. PubMed ID: 29885958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():38-47. PubMed ID: 29673742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; Noo F
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1530-41. PubMed ID: 22380385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography.
    Massera RT; Fernández-Varea JM; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33857930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
    Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Maeda M; Okamoto R; Nakamura M; Higashida Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33120368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Method for the evaluation of a average glandular dose in mammography.
    Okunade AA
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1153-64. PubMed ID: 16696493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.
    Boone JM; Hernandez AM; Seibert JA
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):129-141. PubMed ID: 28573551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms.
    Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 28715130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.