These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12033636)

  • 1. Hearing threshold levels for an otologically unscreened, non-occupationally noise-exposed population in Sweden.
    Johansson MS; Arlinger SD
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Apr; 41(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 12033636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Prince MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 12186037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise-exposed male sheet-metal workers using hearing protectors. A longitudinal study of hearing threshold shifts covering fifteen years.
    Brühl P; Ivarsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8085112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing Loss in Persons Exposed and not Exposed to Occupational Noise.
    Kovalova M; Mrazkova E; Sachova P; Vojkovska K; Tomaskova H; Janoutova J; Janout V
    J Int Adv Otol; 2016 Apr; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 27340983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screened and unscreened hearing threshold levels for the adult population: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study.
    Engdahl B; Tambs K; Borchgrevink HM; Hoffman HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Apr; 44(4):213-30. PubMed ID: 16011050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers.
    Prince MM; Gilbert SJ; Smith RJ; Stayner LT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):871-80. PubMed ID: 12597181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Usefulness of impedance audiometry in the objective evaluation of occupational hearing loss].
    Szmeja Z; Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A; Szyfter W
    Med Pr; 1983; 34(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 6664299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing thresholds, tinnitus, and headphone listening habits in nine-year-old children.
    Båsjö S; Möller C; Widén S; Jutengren G; Kähäri K
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Oct; 55(10):587-96. PubMed ID: 27329351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing levels of firefighters: risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss assessed by cross-sectional and longitudinal data.
    Clark WW; Bohl CD
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 15937413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threshold of hearing as a function of age and sex for the typical unscreened population.
    Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Feb; 22(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 3365524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
    Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Annex C fallacy: why unscreened databases are usually preferable for comparison of industrially exposed groups.
    Dobie RA; Agrawal Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 20516680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of nosocusis, and industrial and gun noise on hearing of U.S. adults.
    Kryter KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):3196-201. PubMed ID: 1787254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended high-frequency audiometry: hearing thresholds in adults.
    Škerková M; Kovalová M; Rychlý T; Tomášková H; Šlachtová H; Čada Z; Maďar R; Mrázková E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 280(2):565-572. PubMed ID: 35763083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing threshold levels for a population of 11 to 35 year old Australian females and males.
    Williams W; Carter L; Seeto M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 24564624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons.
    Lee FS; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15692300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presbyacusis-hearing thresholds and the ISO 7029.
    Stenklev NC; Laukli E
    Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):295-306. PubMed ID: 15357413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory dysfunction in occupational noise exposed workers.
    Sallustio V; Portalatini P; Soleo L; Cassano F; Pesola G; Lasorsa G; Quaranta N; Salonna I
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():95-110. PubMed ID: 9505302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.