310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12034950)
1. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preoperative assessment of asymptomatic adnexal tumors by positron emission tomography and F 18 fluorodeoxyglucose].
Fenchel S; Kotzerke J; Stöhr I; Grab D; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Nuklearmedizin; 1999; 38(4):101-7. PubMed ID: 10392374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. F18-FDG coincidence-PET in patients with suspected gynecological malignancy.
Zor E; Stokkel MP; Ozalp S; Vardareli E; Yalçin OT; Ak I
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 16875342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indirect comparison of the diagnostic performance of
Hu X; Li D; Liang Z; Liao Y; Yang L; Wang R; Wang P; Cai J
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1080. PubMed ID: 34615498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings.
Rieber A; Nüssle K; Stöhr I; Grab D; Fenchel S; Kreienberg R; Reske SN; Brambs HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 11418411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography enhances computed tomography diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.
Sperti C; Bissoli S; Pasquali C; Frison L; Liessi G; Chierichetti F; Pedrazzoli S
Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):932-7; discussion 937-9. PubMed ID: 18043094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI, CT, and PET/CT for ovarian cancer detection and adnexal lesion characterization.
Iyer VR; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 20093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of tubo-ovarian abscess mimicking adnexal masses: Comparison between contrast-enhanced CT,
Fan H; Wang TT; Ren G; Fu HL; Wu XR; Chu CT; Li WH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29458901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlation.
Hann LE; Lui DM; Shi W; Bach AM; Selland DL; Castiel M
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):242-7. PubMed ID: 10887255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of positron emission tomography with tracer 18-fluorodeoxyglucose in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in selected women after ultrasonography.
Kawahara K; Yoshida Y; Kurokawa T; Suzuki Y; Nagahara K; Tsuchida T; Okazawa H; Fujibayashi Y; Yonekura Y; Kotsuji F
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 15232382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.
Ruiz M; Labauge P; Louboutin A; Limot O; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():115-9. PubMed ID: 27583370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging in the assessment of cardiac masses: a pilot study.
Nensa F; Tezgah E; Poeppel TD; Jensen CJ; Schelhorn J; Köhler J; Heusch P; Bruder O; Schlosser T; Nassenstein K
J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 25552667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Barros RHO; Baião AC; Parente DB; Derchain S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation.
Mitchell DG; Mintz MC; Spritzer CE; Gussman D; Arger PH; Coleman BG; Axel L; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 3541026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
