These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12035880)

  • 1. Background beliefs in Bayesian inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Over DE; Perham N
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 12035880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of individual and social information for decision-making in groups of different sizes.
    Park SA; Goïame S; O'Connor DA; Dreher JC
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2001958. PubMed ID: 28658252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural activity tracking identity and confidence in social information.
    Trudel N; Lockwood PL; Rushworth MFS; Wittmann MK
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36763582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Belief polarization is not always irrational.
    Jern A; Chang KM; Kemp C
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):206-24. PubMed ID: 24730598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-bayesian inference: causal structure trumps correlation.
    Bes B; Sloman S; Lucas CG; Raufaste E
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1178-203. PubMed ID: 22734828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian view of covariation assessment.
    McKenzie CR; Mikkelsen LA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):33-61. PubMed ID: 16764849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of domain-specific beliefs on decisions and causal judgments.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M; Maldonado A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24076330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Base rates: both neglected and intuitive.
    Pennycook G; Trippas D; Handley SJ; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 24219086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio.
    Rottman BM
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):270-280. PubMed ID: 27752962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social Information Is Integrated into Value and Confidence Judgments According to Its Reliability.
    De Martino B; Bobadilla-Suarez S; Nouguchi T; Sharot T; Love BC
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(25):6066-6074. PubMed ID: 28566360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rating exposure control using Bayesian decision analysis.
    Hewett P; Logan P; Mulhausen J; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Oct; 3(10):568-81. PubMed ID: 16998991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayes' theorem: a negative example of a RCT on grommets in children with glue ear.
    Rovers MM; van der Wilt GJ; van der Bij S; Straatman H; Ingels K; Zielhuis GA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15756901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rational Inference of Beliefs and Desires From Emotional Expressions.
    Wu Y; Baker CL; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Apr; 42(3):850-884. PubMed ID: 28986938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty.
    Xie B; Hayes B
    Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 46(5):e13144. PubMed ID: 35579865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.